PuTTY semi-bug strange-winsock-msg

This is a mirror. Follow this link to find the primary PuTTY web site.

Home | FAQ | Feedback | Licence | Updates | Mirrors | Keys | Links | Team
Download: Stable · Snapshot | Docs | Changes | Wishlist

summary: Strange WinSock messages cause failed assertion in tree234.c
class: semi-bug: This might or might not be a bug, depending on your precise definition of what a bug is.
priority: medium: This should be fixed one day.
present-in: 0.53 0.53b 2002-12-09 2003-01-07
fixed-in: 2003-01-10 1604a192fe9f62f9f47369c5267f9c3609ebda47 (0.54)

A few people have reported seeing the following assertion failure:

Assertion failed!

Program: C:\Program Files\Putty\putty.exe
File: tree234.c
Line: 536

Expression: relation == REL234_LT || relation == REL234_GT

Appears to be dependent on use of port forwarding. Also, "It was working fine until a few days ago", "funnily enough this started happening in the last couple of weeks", so may be something to do with a Windows hotfix or update. One report indicates that it happens on WinXP but not Win2000; another report is against WinME.


As far as we can tell this implies that WinSock is sending us unexpected messages. As of 2002-12-09, diagnostics have been added of the form "Strange WinSock message: wp=00000000 lp=00000002"; the numbers will help us to debug the problem. Further info from an original reporter (005801c2b80e$b6a3b470$1f69010a@jefflap3):

I have noticed that the lp=1 correlates to the rule for port 3000 and lp=2 correlates to the rule for port 110.

SGT: Reported as fixed in 2003-01-10. (The diagnostics confirmed that WinSock was occasionally sending netevent messages with wParam==0, hence relevant to no socket. If the lParam had contained an error notification for an error which wasn't socket-specific, I might have believed they were meaningful and paid them some attention; but the lParam was actually an ordinary FD_READ/FD_WRITE sort of thing which makes no sense on a non-socket. So I've just put in code to ignore such messages, and that seems to have worked.)

If you want to comment on this web site, see the Feedback page.
Audit trail for this semi-bug.
(last revision of this bug record was at 2016-12-27 11:40:22 +0000)